OAI-PMH: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Geoinformation HSR
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
K
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
 
'Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting'. Part of discussion about [[OSGeodata | open source geodata]].
 
'Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting'. Part of discussion about [[OSGeodata | open source geodata]].
 +
  
 
== Description ==
 
== Description ==
Zeile 18: Zeile 19:
 
* WFS - the OGC thing
 
* WFS - the OGC thing
  
−
== Architecture ==
+
 
 +
== Discussion ==
 +
;Why not just letting crawlers find XML data (or, why a new protocol at all)?:
 +
Commercial web crawlers are estimated to index only approximately 16%
 +
of the total "surface web" and the size of the "deep web" [...] is
 +
estimated to be up to 550 times as large as the surface web. These
 +
problems are due in part to the extremely large scale of the web. To
 +
increase efficiency, a number of techniques have been proposed such as
 +
more accurately estimating web page creation and updates and more
 +
efficient crawling strategies. [...] All of these approaches stem from
 +
the fact that http does not provide semantics to allow web servers to
 +
answer questions of the form "what resources do you have?" and "what
 +
resources have changed since 2004-12-27?" (from: [http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0503069 (Nelson and Van de Sompel et al. 2005)]).
 +
 
 +
Why a harvesting protocol?
 +
* Cross/distributed Searching vs. Harvesting. There are two possible approaches: (from: [http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?resId=1&materialId=0&contribId=s2t3&sessionId=2&subContId=2&confId=a035925 Implementing the OAI-PMH - an introduction]).
 +
** cross searching multiple archives based on protocol like Z39.50
 +
** harvesting metadata into one or more 'central' services – bulk move data to the user-interface
 +
** US digital library experience in this area (e.g. NCSTRL) indicated that cross searching not preferred approach - distributed searching of N nodes viable, but only for small values of N (< 100)
 +
 
 +
* Problems distributed searching: (from: [http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?resId=1&amp;materialId=0&amp;contribId=s2t3&amp;sessionId=2&amp;subContId=2&amp;confId=a035925 Implementing the OAI-PMH - an introduction])
 +
** Collection description: How do you know which targets to search?
 +
** Query-language problem: Syntax varies and drifts over time between the various nodes.
 +
** Rank-merging problem: How do you meaningfully merge multiple result sets?
 +
** Performance: tends to be limited by slowest target; difficult to build browse interface
 +
 
 +
=== Architecture ===
 +
Note the notions of two two logical groups of services: (from: [http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?resId=1&amp;materialId=0&amp;contribId=s2t3&amp;sessionId=2&amp;subContId=2&amp;confId=a035925 Implementing the OAI-PMH - an introduction])
 +
* Data providers
 +
** handle deposit/publishing of resources in archive
 +
** expose metadata about resources in archive
 +
* Service providers
 +
** harvest metadata from data providers
 +
** use it to offer single user-interface across all harvested metadata
 +
Note: data provider may also be responsible for human-oriented (i.e. Web) interface to archive
 +
both functions may be offered by same ‘service’
 +
 
 
[[Bild: OAI-PMH_Architecture.png]]
 
[[Bild: OAI-PMH_Architecture.png]]
  
Zeile 28: Zeile 65:
  
 
For Tools and Demos see Weblinks section below.
 
For Tools and Demos see Weblinks section below.
 +
  
 
== Weblinks ==
 
== Weblinks ==
−
 
 
* [http://www.openarchives.org/ Open Archives Initiative (OAI) Home])
 
* [http://www.openarchives.org/ Open Archives Initiative (OAI) Home])
 
* [http://www.oaforum.org/documents/ OAI forum] and [http://www.openarchives.org/mailman/listinfo/OAI-general/ OAI general mailing list]  
 
* [http://www.oaforum.org/documents/ OAI forum] and [http://www.openarchives.org/mailman/listinfo/OAI-general/ OAI general mailing list]  

Version vom 10. August 2006, 08:21 Uhr

'Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting'. Part of discussion about open source geodata.


Description

  • Leightweight:
    • A low barrier interoperability specification
    • RESTful: HTTP based, GET / POST requests, XML responses
  • Clear concepts:
    • Based around metadata harvesting model (metadata aggregation and syndication)
    • Metadata about resources, mandates unqualified Dublin Core as default
    • Not a search protocol! That could be for example enhanced or merged versions of OpenSearch/GeoRSS and SRU/SRW besides WFS.
  • Extendable: Has extension mechanism for more domain specific metadata models
  • Stable: OAI has committed to making subsequent revisions of the protocol backwards compatible.
  • Established: Implemented - among others - by Google, CiteSeer and MSN as well as by dozens of open source tools, like OAICat (Java) or mod_oai (C, installed at 500 sites); see more tools in the Weblinks section below.

There are following alternatives (Remarks: all considered either inappropriate or not established or at least 'painfull' compared to OAI-PMH):

  • Z39.50 and SRW - the more leightweight and 'modern' successor of Z39.50
  • UDDI - the SOAP thing
  • WFS - the OGC thing


Discussion

Why not just letting crawlers find XML data (or, why a new protocol at all)?

Commercial web crawlers are estimated to index only approximately 16% of the total "surface web" and the size of the "deep web" [...] is estimated to be up to 550 times as large as the surface web. These problems are due in part to the extremely large scale of the web. To increase efficiency, a number of techniques have been proposed such as more accurately estimating web page creation and updates and more efficient crawling strategies. [...] All of these approaches stem from the fact that http does not provide semantics to allow web servers to answer questions of the form "what resources do you have?" and "what resources have changed since 2004-12-27?" (from: (Nelson and Van de Sompel et al. 2005)).

Why a harvesting protocol?

  • Cross/distributed Searching vs. Harvesting. There are two possible approaches: (from: Implementing the OAI-PMH - an introduction).
    • cross searching multiple archives based on protocol like Z39.50
    • harvesting metadata into one or more 'central' services – bulk move data to the user-interface
    • US digital library experience in this area (e.g. NCSTRL) indicated that cross searching not preferred approach - distributed searching of N nodes viable, but only for small values of N (< 100)
  • Problems distributed searching: (from: Implementing the OAI-PMH - an introduction)
    • Collection description: How do you know which targets to search?
    • Query-language problem: Syntax varies and drifts over time between the various nodes.
    • Rank-merging problem: How do you meaningfully merge multiple result sets?
    • Performance: tends to be limited by slowest target; difficult to build browse interface

Architecture

Note the notions of two two logical groups of services: (from: Implementing the OAI-PMH - an introduction)

  • Data providers
    • handle deposit/publishing of resources in archive
    • expose metadata about resources in archive
  • Service providers
    • harvest metadata from data providers
    • use it to offer single user-interface across all harvested metadata

Note: data provider may also be responsible for human-oriented (i.e. Web) interface to archive both functions may be offered by same ‘service’

OAI-PMH Architecture.png

Specifications

For Tools and Demos see Weblinks section below.


Weblinks

Von «https://giswiki.hsr.ch/index.php?title=OAI-PMH&oldid=2789»