OSGeodata metadata exchange protocol: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Geoinformation HSR
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
(Overview)
(Protocol Approaches: Searching or Haresting?)
Zeile 10: Zeile 10:
 
We distinguish specifically ''query/search protocols'' and ''harvesting procotols''.
 
We distinguish specifically ''query/search protocols'' and ''harvesting procotols''.
  
==Protocol Approaches: Searching or Haresting? ==
+
==Protocol Approaches: Searching or Harvesting? ==
  
 
Geographic Metadata Harvesting Protocol approaches and specifications:  
 
Geographic Metadata Harvesting Protocol approaches and specifications:  
 
* Use HTTP and XML ('autonomous discovery')
 
* Use HTTP and XML ('autonomous discovery')
 
* [[OAI-PMH]] including a comparison with WFS (profiled)
 
* [[OAI-PMH]] including a comparison with WFS (profiled)
 
  
 
==Proposals==
 
==Proposals==

Version vom 21. August 2006, 10:18 Uhr

This is part of a discussion around a geographic metadata model and an exchange protocol.

See also OSGeodataMetadataModel and generally OSGeodata.


Overview

A protocol specification consists of requests (operations) and responses (information model encoded in a streaming format and error messages, as codes).

We distinguish specifically query/search protocols and harvesting procotols.

Protocol Approaches: Searching or Harvesting?

Geographic Metadata Harvesting Protocol approaches and specifications:

  • Use HTTP and XML ('autonomous discovery')
  • OAI-PMH including a comparison with WFS (profiled)

Proposals

We tend to propose a harvesting approach which means, that in a first step XML files are published and in a second step OAI-PMH could be utilized.

Better name sought (catalogue is probably not the most appropriate noun):

  1. Geographic Metadata Syndication Protocol
  2. Geographic Metadata Harvesting Protocol
  • Other proposals?
    • Geographic Data Discovery Protocol
    • Geographic Metadata Dissemination Protocol


Weblinks